Commenters don’t seem to understand what the metric means. This is saying that a subscriber to r/poor is 118x more likely to engage with r/btc than a randomly c

Commenters don’t seem to understand what the metric means. This is saying that a subscriber to r/poor is 118x more likely to engage with r/btc than a randomly chosen redditor. It doesn’t mean that bitcoiners are more likely to be poor. It doesn’t really mean poor people are likely to be on btc either if r/poor is just not representative. But the initial statement does seem solid. The size of the group doesn’t really impact this assuming it’s not tiny.