41 ms·
HCQ can be effective when used early and in correct dosages, as shown in hundreds of peer-reviewed studies. One widely-publicised, large Lancet study claiming i
by argvargc 5y ago
HCQ can be effective when used early and in correct dosages, as shown in hundreds of peer-reviewed studies. One widely-publicised, large Lancet study claiming it was "unsafe" was later retracted as it turned out to be made up BS. [0]
Living meta-study of 300+ likely non-pretend control studies on 400k+ patients:
https://c19hcq.com/ https://c19hcq.com/
(Edit to add: And this was apparent early-on. Nothing much has changed with HCQ's profile since it was first identified as an effective, safe therapeutic in early 2020.)
[0] https://dissidentvoice.org/2020/08/lancetgate-why-was-this-monumental-fraud-not-a-huge-scandal/ https://dissidentvoice.org/2020/08/lancetgate-why-was-this-m...
- strken 5y agoDon't really have the time to go through these right now, but I'll look through them later. Thanks! Initial impression is that taking the average of every published paper across different metrics makes you vulnerable to publication bias (and probably other stuff), but I'd need to make a funnel plot and check out the opinions of actual trained scientists to know whether that's true here. I'm guessing that some studies on each side are probably going to have suspicious or outright false data, too (like the one you mention).
- inter_netuser 5y agocan you link to the retraction of that study?
- dazilcher 5y agohttps://tinyurl.com/55rext65 https://tinyurl.com/55rext65