3 ms·
Personally I would not buy property south of the 45th parallel anymore (in the northern hemisphere). Even north of that we have seen shockingly high temperature
by irrational 5y ago
Personally I would not buy property south of the 45th parallel anymore (in the northern hemisphere). Even north of that we have seen shockingly high temperatures. Anything south of that will become a hellscape within our lifetime.
- sumedh 5y ago> Personally I would not buy property south of the 45th parallel anymore Obama bought a property in Martha's Vineyard, why would a former President with all the knowledge about global warming buy it?
- arn 5y agoCause he’s rich and can afford it regardless what happens. Why would you pay for ice at a convenience store when you could make it yourself at home.
- sumedh 5y ago> Cause he’s rich and can afford it regardless what happens. I dont think rich people like to lose money. Would you pay for ice when you know it would already melt when you get it?
- arn 5y agoIf I could use it for 20 years first, definitely.
- sumedh 5y agoWhat happens after 20 years?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- irrational 5y agoObama will be 80 in 20 years. Maybe OP means he will be close to death so he won’t care about climate change affecting his vacation home.
- arn 5y agoya, I'm saying that even if climate change does destroy his beach house in 20 years, they will have gotten 20 years of use out of it.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- galangalalgol 5y agoLatitude will have less impact than altitude from the projections I have seen. Bogota may be less impacted than Anchorage.
- trentnix 5y agoBet.
- quickthrower2 5y agoMaybe the futurist should not hold real estate at all - keep wealth in stocks and rent and let the landlords place their bets on chaos theory.
- ed_balls 5y agoit depends if it's east or west. Chicago is 42o, similar to Madrid, but I think Madrid will have bigger problems.