Trust != monopoly, for a reason. For example, OP lists Amazon and Google as other viable targets for trust busting, yet their primary products/services also ha

Trust != monopoly, for a reason. For example, OP lists Amazon and Google as other viable targets for trust busting, yet their primary products/services also have competitors. The issue is that, while they do have competitors, the lot of them have decided to act in certain ways that are overly harmful to the consumer. Would Facebook/Google/Amazon do even more damage as a true monopoly? Of course. Should they have to get to that point before anything is done? Definitely not -- for one, they're too smart to let themselves become proper monopolies.