3 ms·
Partnership contracts bind non-signers from receiving benefits of a partnership. And with good reason: you wouldn't want any ole schmoe laying claim to the frui
by dls2016 5y ago
Partnership contracts bind non-signers from receiving benefits of a partnership. And with good reason: you wouldn't want any ole schmoe laying claim to the fruits of your labor.
Contracts deprive non-signers of things all the time. That's kind of the point.
Do you have a problem with corporations signing "exclusive" deals with other corporations?
- erik_seaberg 5y agoYes, for party A to penalize party B for doing business with party C is an attack on free market competition which should be banned.
- dls2016 5y agoPenalize? So it’s ok for a group of people to enter a contract to form a corporation (“penalizing” non-signatories by preventing them from benefiting from the profits of the corporation)… but it’s not ok for a group of people to enter a contract to collectively bargain with a corporation (“penalizing” non-signatories by preventing them from benefiting from the contract). This is absurd. You’re saying a corporation cannot enter into a contract to be the exclusive supplier of a widget to another corporation?
- erik_seaberg 5y ago“I won’t work for less than $x” is fine. “You can’t hire anyone else willing to work for less than $x” is extortionate. Competition is necessary for a market.