This is actually not really true? > A motion to dismiss means they assume that every fact alleged by the FTC is true. FB actually claims that every fact is fa

This is actually not really true? > A motion to dismiss means they assume that every fact alleged by the FTC is true. FB actually claims that every fact is false. The motion more means, that its so evident that the claim is false that it shouldn't be litigated. (eg. you wouldn't carry a trial claiming fb was a monopoly book-seller). > The judge said, essentially, that if every fact the FTC alleges is true, then it is at least feasible that the FTC could have a successful lawsuit. This is true. The judge said there was doubt over the truth of the FTC allegations, but those truths could be decided in court. Specifically, questions over market definition (key to proving monopoly) were unproven and had significant doubts.The courts rejected the suit once already over these definitions, so this is a followup that adds details... but not much details.