3 ms·
> MS stack will be high quality I've yet to experience a MS product that I would consider to be "high quality" (including Azure)
by blibble 5y ago
> MS stack will be high quality
I've yet to experience a MS product that I would consider to be "high quality" (including Azure)
- throwawaybbqed 5y agoAzure is not bad compared to the options. Also, MSFT is throwing a lot of brain power at it (notable systems researchers from MSR). Curious what you consider is better?
- blibble 5y agomost of my bad experience with Azure is the control interface, which is worse than AWS/GCP in every way random incomprehensible error messages, near constant UI timeouts and terrible UI performance and experience (artifact deployment has been "skipped"? why? no way to know), etc the Windows VMs are also extremely slow compared to my employer's non-azure VM, with the Azure VMs having double the VCPUs, disk IOPS and RAM (despite having the same "stack" deployed on it)
- hackerfromthefu 5y agoI haven't experienced these UI problems despite regular use of Azure. The VM speed I can't comment on.
- yokoprime 5y agoWhy the same quote and reply with both your accounts?
- blibble 5y agoit's possible that more than one person thinks that Microsoft products are less than high quality
- kcartlidge 5y ago> I've yet to experience a MS product that I would consider to be "high quality" (including Azure) Most aren't. Some are. As with all software/ecosystem providers.