4 ms·
A union at google would be sufficient for the unions to operate a single party state. It's not a workers rights issue, it's a national security one, imo.
by motohagiography 5y ago
A union at google would be sufficient for the unions to operate a single party state. It's not a workers rights issue, it's a national security one, imo.
- skywal_l 5y agoOh so you are worried about what a union could do at google, but what google does is not a problem?
- woodruffw 5y agoThis is a weird analogy: Google is not a state, and a union's labor positions don't reflect the individual political positions of its members (this is famously a point of frustration among liberals). If you're actually worried about national security: consider the fact that many of the police forces in the US are in "unions" that menace your local elected representatives and openly subvert the justice system they belong to when it attempts to prosecute cops[1]. [1]: https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-trouble-with-police-unions https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-trou...