2 ms·
> larger particles, this is almost certainly an upper bound as well Shouldn't it be better at filtering larger particles, and therefore a lower bound? Or am I
by travisporter 5y ago
> larger particles, this is almost certainly an upper bound as well
Shouldn't it be better at filtering larger particles, and therefore a lower bound? Or am I getting confused
Agree that putting numbers like this are misleading.
- andrewla 5y agoYes, I meant lower bound. Corrected.