2 ms·
Sure it’s not a direct per-transaction carbon footprint - but every transaction has mining fees, and more transactions mean there’s more money in mining which m
by kennywinker 5y ago
Sure it’s not a direct per-transaction carbon footprint - but every transaction has mining fees, and more transactions mean there’s more money in mining which means more miners which means more carbon burnt.
- vmception 5y agothis doesn't affect demand enough to die on that hill.
- kennywinker 5y agoSo far it has. The amount of co2 emitted by mining has gone up to match it’s adoption… is that supposed to stop somehow?
- vmception 5y agoThe price on exchanges has little to do with onchain activity, which has always been a criticism of the valuation metrics, you are somehow reappropriating that retroactively in a way incompatible with the other criticism its mind boggling… I would say more but I’m reserving my thoughts in case you have a rationale that is more convincing