4 ms·
Both the A and the I in AI are debatable terms. The sole definition of intelligence is under heavy load of reconsideration the last decades with the emergence
by xcambar 5y ago
Both the A and the I in AI are debatable terms.
The sole definition of intelligence is under heavy load of reconsideration the last decades with the emergence of a better knowledge of animal cognition, for example.
- kortex 5y agoWhy is the A[rtificial] under debate? It's not natural (biological) intelligence, unless one goes the route "humans are a part of nature therefore the things we make like plastic and skyscrapers and hamburgers are natural".
- xcambar 5y agoIt needs to be wondered whether drawing a face or winning a game of go may or may not actually be real intelligence, only very narrow. We like to think that AI is only statistical models, which may be true (is true?), but we have no idea that what happens in brains is anything else than a highly optimised, deconstructed, such model. Current datasets need 10ks pics of a cat while a kid only need to see a cat twice? Good for the kid, but there's no hint there's a fundamental difference of process.