> It will allow a bunch of people to skim-read detailed research publications and miss all the nuances that matter. I have to disagree, there’s nothing stoppi

> It will allow a bunch of people to skim-read detailed research publications and miss all the nuances that matter. I have to disagree, there’s nothing stopping readers from doing this already, I think it’s quite common I do agree that one needs to actually read the paper to really understand the context of some equation, but honestly flipping between the abbreviation table or the dense prose of “where x is foo, y is bar, zzz” it’s just not readable. I don’t think it’s would make sense to use this style for every equation ever, but I think it has utility