3 ms·
They’re the end result of asking biased questions then manipulating answers to fit those biased questions. My point is that if you ask biased questions it won’t
by awb 5y ago
They’re the end result of asking biased questions then manipulating answers to fit those biased questions. My point is that if you ask biased questions it won’t be long until someone provides biased answers.
You need to ask unbiased questions to get unbiased answers.
- whatshisface 5y ago"Does tobacco smoking cause cancer," isn't a biased question... What's biased is answering it with a "no."
- awb 5y agoRight but when asked by biased people, with biased intent, it solicits biased answers. It looks innocent on the surface but it’s anything but.
- whatshisface 5y agoIf it's the people and their intent then I think we're agreeing that it's not the questions themselves, but the ways they can be biased-ly answered.
- jonathanstrange 5y agoYou're simplifying too much. The tobacco company example illustrates very well how you can distract and lead astray by asking biased questions. Leading (smoking) statisticians like Fisher continued to point out there may be confounding causes. He did not falsify data. Even a spurious discussion about a "smoking gene" was created. Asking questions may seem innocent but it can be done strategically and can hinder drawing the right conclusions. Eventually the scientific method would correct those views, but it took more than 40 years even though the statistical data was available from the start. Judea Pearl dedicates a whole chapter (Ch. 5) of his The Book of Why to this example.