3 ms·
Being peer-reviewed is a joke - especially when it is so easy to falsify or hide data, as was done in ClimateGate. Being peer-reviewed is also a joke when your
by gavanwoolery 15y ago
Being peer-reviewed is a joke - especially when it is so easy to falsify or hide data, as was done in ClimateGate.
Being peer-reviewed is also a joke when your peers all sip the same cool-aid.
- guelo 15y agoYou did not answer my question, where did you get your information that the scientists have not tried to disprove the warming theories?
- gavanwoolery 15y agoI'm going to repaste this for the sake of convenience: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the... If any study can address all of the concerns quoted here, I'll shut my mouth. In the face of some of gaping inconsistencies, I would think that many studies did not try to question their hypotheses thoroughly enough.
- Tichy 15y agoYou admitted in anther thread that you don't even know what ClimateGate was about, yet you cite it again. #fail