4 ms·
Ohhh, that's stupid, of course it had multitasking, but if you didn't understand what I am talking about you probably shouldn't reply. Also, in your sense ever
by buster 15y ago
Ohhh, that's stupid, of course it had multitasking, but if you didn't understand what I am talking about you probably shouldn't reply.
Also, in your sense every phone on the planet had multitasking because I can speak and listen at the same time.it was obvious that I was talking about multitasking for apps
- pohl 15y agoThe phone feature is implemented as an app.
- buster 15y agoWhat does it matter when other apps didn't have access to it? So in the end everyone seems to agree that Apple, although easily possible, didn't want to give multitasking to its customers. Sounds even worse to me..
- tjogin 15y agoAndroid fanboys probably agree with that. But they're not everyone.