3 ms·
This is 16:8. That's not really fasting per se. The problem is that the term "fasting" is massively overloaded, covering the whole gamut from folks who skip bre
by arcticbull 5y ago
This is 16:8. That's not really fasting per se. The problem is that the term "fasting" is massively overloaded, covering the whole gamut from folks who skip breakfast (in 16:8 you can eat lunch at noon and dinner at 7-8pm) to ADF (where you eat ad libitum every second day) to some folks who from time to time don't eat 3, 5, 7, 14, or 21 days.
It's not really news that if you skip breakfast you can still stay fat. Ditto its not news if you don't eat for 3 weeks straight you super will. I think the interesting studies cover the in between. IMO.
- netizen-936824 5y agoCorrect! I believe the term used in research is "time restricted feeding"