4 ms·
I feel comfortable asserting you've never not used a complex web application, even for your personal non-commercial projects made for fun. The fact that his web
by superkuh 5y ago
I feel comfortable asserting you've never not used a complex web application, even for your personal non-commercial projects made for fun. The fact that his website (and other projects) is in HTML and doesn't need to be executed is a confirmation of the article ideas not some deficit.
You can justify what you do with JS for money however you want but businesses do it that way because managers decided it's cheapest way for many people to collaborate, not because it's the best way for end users, security, or longevity.
- phailhaus 5y agoWhat is the purpose of his website? It is to serve static content. But obviously, his entire rant is against more complex, interactive, and stateful applications. It's strange to argue that because static sites exist, all sites should be static.
- superkuh 5y ago>his entire rant is against more complex, interactive, and stateful applications. ... where they aren't needed. Which is the vast majority of websites, even commercial ones. It's a rare website that actually is an application and not just a means to display text or images.