5 ms·
> The polygons are not people, they are trivial mathematical agents with explicit bias The author is clearly talking about people: > So, fellow shapes, rememb
by crackercrews 5y ago
> The polygons are not people, they are trivial mathematical agents with explicit bias
The author is clearly talking about people:
> So, fellow shapes, remember it's not about triangles vs squares, it's about deciding what we want the world to look like, and settling for no less.
- zamfi 5y agoSure, the author is trying to make an argument about people by showing what happens in systems of simplified agents. That doesn’t change the fact that the polygons are not people. Crash test dummies are also not people, despite usefully standing in for people in crash tests.