I feel that replacing a package with one that doesn't fulfil the same needs in a patch update because you feel that "no warranty implied" justified it is as muc

I feel that replacing a package with one that doesn't fulfil the same needs in a patch update because you feel that "no warranty implied" justified it is as much "slimy, technical" use of that license. Again, if Marak is going to rely on technicalities, I don't blame npm for treating him with as much good faith as he treated his users.