>"If they're a terrorist they're a terrorist and should be prosecuted as such. No need for insurrection apologetics." Ah yes, but who will distinguish between

>"If they're a terrorist they're a terrorist and should be prosecuted as such. No need for insurrection apologetics." Ah yes, but who will distinguish between terrorism and protest? The CHAZ/CHOP certainly had the hallmarks of an insurrection, too. Edit: Ultimately, the decision/determination to charge someone with "terrorism" will be made by a District Attorney or some Attorneys General. These positions are all political in nature and the people holding these offices are under a great deal of pressure behind-the-scenes. THAT is where my trepidation comes from, as political adversary vs. political ally has a massive influence in who gets charged with what.