4 ms·

Sometimes you want a communication to be public, loud, and undeniable, even if you don't want it to be understood by all. It makes it difficult to later deny t

Sometimes you want a communication to be public, loud, and undeniable, even if you don't want it to be understood by all. It makes it difficult to later deny that the order was given, it'll be recorded many times over by friend and foe alike. Recipients can possibly confirm that their counterparts are also receiving consistent orders.

bendbro 5y ago
You were the sole person who understood my poorly worded question. How did you come to the correct interpretation of my question, given information was missing from my question? Did you assume that I realized the content of Skyking messages is encrypted, and then deduce that my question must relate to the other unencrypted parts?
- nightpool 5y ago
  It could also be that goodluckchuck didn't know that the content of the Skyking message was encrypted :P
  - bendbro 5y ago
    True :) Though I think he did understand that, given "even if you don't want it to be understood by all"
Terry_Roll 5y ago
Like the Radio 4 Doomsday protocol? https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1528497/bbc-radio-4-today-programme-off-air-doomsday-protocol-nuclear-war-shipping-forecast-spt https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1528497/bbc-radio...