5 ms·

Relevant (8/2021): https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1426566250428211205 https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/14265662504282112... Potential Ter

Relevant (8/2021): https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1426566250428211205 https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/14265662504282112... Potential Terror threats (from HHS): - Opposition to COVID measures - Claims of election fraud, believe Trump will be reinstated - 9/11 holidays and religious holidays Relevant (today, started 10/2021): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10391397/Biden-education-secretary-solicited-National-School-Boards-letter-comparing-parents-terrorists.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10391397/Biden-educ... Potential Terror threats (from DOJ): - Parents at school boards

kstrauser 5y ago
Even if those were true -- and I don't believe they are -- Washington Times authors and the Daily Mail are terrible sources to prove it.
- lettergram 5y ago
  DailyMail tends to have some of the more accurate reporting. They always cite their content (unlike say, CNN - go check, they always self-reference). You can see the letters in the article. I don’t know what to say, it’s clearly there. Same with the news broadcast on NBC, watched it live just searched a video and Twitter popped up).
  - kstrauser 5y ago
    > DailyMail tends to have some of the more accurate reporting. You're joking, right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail#Reliability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail#Reliability
    - lettergram 5y ago
      That all looks political to me... I'll stick with reviewing content with citations (and reviewing associated citations). Wikipedia is fairly partisan. Thus far, as stated, it's clear to me DailyMail provides more citations I can use to confirm the data myself. I guess to your point, I don't believe them, the New York Times, NPR, NBC, etc unless I can confirm the data myself.
    - lp0_on_fire 5y ago
      Wikipedia isn't exactly an unbiased source of information, either.
joey_bob 5y ago
Any chance the first link is fake?
- orang2tang 5y ago
  How would the first link be fake? lmao
- lettergram 5y ago
  I watched it live so I don’t believe so.
- f0xtrot 5y ago
  The video about dhs issuing a statement? I think this may be what they were referring to. https://www.dhs.gov/ntas/advisory/national-terrorism-advisory-system-bulletin-august-13-2021 https://www.dhs.gov/ntas/advisory/national-terrorism-advisor...
tandymodel100 5y ago
[dead]

kstrauser 5y ago

Even if those were true -- and I don't believe they are -- Washington Times authors and the Daily Mail are terrible sources to prove it.

lettergram 5y ago
DailyMail tends to have some of the more accurate reporting. They always cite their content (unlike say, CNN - go check, they always self-reference). You can see the letters in the article. I don’t know what to say, it’s clearly there. Same with the news broadcast on NBC, watched it live just searched a video and Twitter popped up).
- kstrauser 5y ago
  > DailyMail tends to have some of the more accurate reporting. You're joking, right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail#Reliability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail#Reliability
  - lettergram 5y ago
    That all looks political to me... I'll stick with reviewing content with citations (and reviewing associated citations). Wikipedia is fairly partisan. Thus far, as stated, it's clear to me DailyMail provides more citations I can use to confirm the data myself. I guess to your point, I don't believe them, the New York Times, NPR, NBC, etc unless I can confirm the data myself.
  - lp0_on_fire 5y ago
    Wikipedia isn't exactly an unbiased source of information, either.

joey_bob 5y ago

Any chance the first link is fake?

orang2tang 5y ago
How would the first link be fake? lmao
lettergram 5y ago
I watched it live so I don’t believe so.
f0xtrot 5y ago
The video about dhs issuing a statement? I think this may be what they were referring to. https://www.dhs.gov/ntas/advisory/national-terrorism-advisory-system-bulletin-august-13-2021 https://www.dhs.gov/ntas/advisory/national-terrorism-advisor...

tandymodel100 5y ago

[dead]