The only reasonable option I have is to give others the benefit of the doubt, as I expect others to give me. The videos in question are clearly not directed at

The only reasonable option I have is to give others the benefit of the doubt, as I expect others to give me. The videos in question are clearly not directed at children. Do you not see the hypocrisy of your appeal ban one mans commentary on the mental state of adult subjects in these videos based on your own unsubstaintiated commentary of the mental capacity of other adults who are merely viewers of the former? At least the videos we are talking about comment on the movements and words of the subjects therein, flawed as that limited view may be. At least that is something that can be discussed. You offer absolutely no evidence to support your claim that the video viewers are "mentally toddlers", as you don't even know who they are, and yet you have the gall to question the expertise of the publisher.