> Generally that means not having reduced revenue. I think this is the fundamental disagreement we have, and it's probably too big of a conversation for a comm

> Generally that means not having reduced revenue. I think this is the fundamental disagreement we have, and it's probably too big of a conversation for a comment thread. In my philosophy of determining "best interest", revenue is an important consideration, but not the only one and not the most important one. There is certainly no legal duty to increase revenue or stock price or anything like that.