10 ms·
... in spite of alienating millions of users in their quixotic quest to purge it. Maybe time to accept that "hate speech" is as an inescapable byproduct of hum
by commandlinefan 5y ago
... in spite of alienating millions of users in their quixotic quest to purge it. Maybe time to accept that "hate speech" is as an inescapable byproduct of human communication as much as it is undefinable?
- smoldesu 5y agoDo you think they'd report Hacker News as containing hate speech since we're disproportionately hostile to JavaScript developers?
- fknorangesite 5y ago> in spite of alienating millions of users in their quixotic quest to purge it I think you are dramatically overestimating the number of users who: - disagree with purging hateful content in the first place; - actually follow through on their promise^W threat to leave; and - stay gone
- aurizon 5y agoOne could use Darwinian methods, where "hate speech" carries a higher risk of 'predation' ie = terminal modding. There may be a way to use recursive bots who look back at assorted offender threads and detect a pattern. A person who reserves his venom for a few select threads, and on all the other threads he comments on he is, as Mae West said, 'pure as the driven snow...' The bot would need to be able to detect places, where, as Mae West also said - 'but I drifted' The unpaid mods should be honored for their work, and work with these bots to increase the level of persistent detection and harassment of the hate speakers. 'Eternal vigilence = price of freedom' - someone said.