3 ms·
Do you have data on the quantity of chips rather than overall revenue? You claim this figure is meaningless. In the absence of reliable data, we can make a rea
by network2592 5y ago
Do you have data on the quantity of chips rather than overall revenue? You claim this figure is meaningless. In the absence of reliable data, we can make a reasonable assumption, perhaps flawed, that revenue is matched by quantity of chips. But, it is certainly not meaningless.
- rjzzleep 5y ago> we can make a reasonable assumption, perhaps flawed, that revenue is matched by quantity of chips No, most institutions don't publish what their production capacity is. There is an article claiming that TSMC makes "92% of world's most sophisticated chips". Define most sophisticated. You can't just throw in revenue graphs and pretend they show anything of value, just because north america measures success solely in revenue and growth. The burden of proof is not on me, it's for you to substantiate your claims. EDIT: Interesting to see people bring in random graphs from CNBC. Things that would not even be considered investment advice and present it as scientific evidence without any sort of due diligence on their. Sad that this is the kind of discourse that we have to have. Things are not automatically true, valid, or contextual just because a big media corporation published them.
- network2592 5y agoYour claim is that revenue evidence is meaningless. The burden of proof is on you. You are suggesting that the majority of low quality chips are manufactured outside of Taiwan. You have not defined your operational definitions for chip quality. You do not even have evidence on the quantity of chips. In the absence of any data that would contradict this, we can reasonably assume revenue figures are a sensible proxy for quantity of chips.