9 ms·
Is there any reason to assume this timestamp represents the time the test was taken, rather than, say, the time the certificate was generated?
by hanoz 5y ago
Is there any reason to assume this timestamp represents the time the test was taken, rather than, say, the time the certificate was generated?
- TylerLives 5y agoWe need someone from Serbia who has done this test to verify.
- hanoz 5y agoMeanwhile let's all accuse him of being a dirty cheat no matter how implausible such a potentially ruinous fraud on its inevitable discovery. After all the man is guilty of covid wrongthink, so who knows what depths he'd sink to.
- aix1 5y agoThe timeline doesn't look good for him regardless of which theory is correct: https://www.bbc.com/news/59939122 https://www.bbc.com/news/59939122
- logifail 5y ago> The timeline doesn't look good for him [..] There are scientists who state we're at the point where "we need to target the vulnerable" (rather than giving boosters to all over-12s) and that "there [is] no point in trying to stop all infections, and that at some point, society has to open up". Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, chairman of the [UK's] Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation is one of them.
- lern_too_spel 5y agoThe point when society has to open up is when there is enough community immunity that removing mitigations doesn't cause healthcare shortages due to staff infections or resource constraints. That's after Paxlovid is readily available or vaccine mandates have driven up vaccination rates, not today.
- tata71 5y agoWhat region do you think is going to achieve another +10% on their current "fully" vaccinated ratio?
- logifail 5y agoIt appears that some regions may actually be at risk of driving ratios downwards as they shorten the validity of vaccination certificates for those already "fully vaccinated" but who haven't had additional shots since then.
- lern_too_spel 5y agoMost of the country. There are only a few places where the vaccination rate is already high enough that a mandate couldn't increase it at least 10%. The scare quotes around "fully" are unnecessary. Two doses is enough to drive down hospitalization risk to flu levels. Boosters aren't necessary from a public health perspective because boosting the already vaccinated has a miniscule effect on total hospitalizations. (Sure, if you want them to reduce your own risk, that's fine because they have been approved. If you want them to reduce disruptions in your workplace, that is also fine. Just don't expect to materially impact health system availability.) Vaccinating the unvaccinated has a much larger effect. Alternatively, Omicron seems like it will reach them before mandates take effect or Paxlovid supply is ready, with worse outcomes on the health system.
- logifail 5y ago> Two doses is enough to drive down hospitalization risk to flu levels. Boosters aren't necessary from a public health perspective because boosting the already vaccinated has a miniscule effect on total hospitalizations. If you look at the data, it appears that vaccinating the young and healthy has "a miniscule effect on total hospitalizations", too.
- lern_too_spel 5y agoThere are very few young and healthy in the parts of the country where vaccination rates are low. The last Covid hospitalization surge in the US was mostly working age adults, whom the mandates would apply to.
- zo1 5y agoThere is someone doing just that in the thread above.
- input_sh 5y agoJudging by my vaccine confirmation (same system), it's when the certificate was created. In my case the timestamp points to a day after I've received my dose.