4 ms·

Yeah, thats right. Also some other alarming details like Novak knew he tested positive and yet instead of quarantining he went on to attend a gathering of child

by Bhilai 5y ago

Yeah, thats right. Also some other alarming details like Novak knew he tested positive and yet instead of quarantining he went on to attend a gathering of children unmasked.

est31 5y ago
Wasn't that gathering on the Dec 17th date, one day after the claimed (but apparently predated) positive test on Dec 16th?
- tut-urut-utut 5y ago
  It's not unusual to have to wait for one or two days for the PCR test results. Same day tests are more of an exception in most of the Europe. If he didn't have any symptoms, and was doing PCR test regularly just to be sure, he had to reason not to go to the gathering.
  - DominikPeters 5y ago
    The positive test certificate says that the sample was taken on 16 Dec at 13:05, and the result was returned on 16 Dec at 20:19.
  - kklisura 5y ago
    He received the PCR test results within 7 hours on the 16th. https://twitter.com/BenRothenberg/status/1480448426332413953 https://twitter.com/BenRothenberg/status/1480448426332413953
    - tut-urut-utut 5y ago
      It says results were issued / ready, not that he received it. And given they were ready at 8pm it’s quite possible that the guy that makes Djokovics mail account was long gone. It may even have landed in the Spam folder if he is using Gmail (happened to me once).
      - aix1 5y ago
        C'mon, we're all adults here (and so is he). The "dog ate my homework" defense doesn't really cut it among grown-ups.
        tut-urut-utut 5y ago
        Exactly, this is a potential criminal offence in Serbia, and school rules don’t apply here. It’s up to the court to decide what happened. I guess that Serbian courts can get the details about the results delivery. All it has to do is ask email providers to check logs, both on the sending and receiving side. As always, it’s the one making accusation that needs to provide a proof. On the other side, he can claim before Serbian court that all is five and the test was fake, but he can’t be processed about that in Serbia, since he neither faked nor used it there. And in Australia he can claim test is valid, and Australia would need to prove it’s fake if the want to cancel his visa. Which they cannot prove that easily, since Serbian authorities are not obliged to jump on immediately on the Australian request. Yes, it would be a loophole and playing two legal systems, but that’s what companies do all the time when it comes to taxes.

by Bhilai 5y ago

Yeah, thats right. Also some other alarming details like Novak knew he tested positive and yet instead of quarantining he went on to attend a gathering of children unmasked.

est31 5y ago

Wasn't that gathering on the Dec 17th date, one day after the claimed (but apparently predated) positive test on Dec 16th?

tut-urut-utut 5y ago
It's not unusual to have to wait for one or two days for the PCR test results. Same day tests are more of an exception in most of the Europe. If he didn't have any symptoms, and was doing PCR test regularly just to be sure, he had to reason not to go to the gathering.
- DominikPeters 5y ago
  The positive test certificate says that the sample was taken on 16 Dec at 13:05, and the result was returned on 16 Dec at 20:19.
- kklisura 5y ago
  He received the PCR test results within 7 hours on the 16th. https://twitter.com/BenRothenberg/status/1480448426332413953 https://twitter.com/BenRothenberg/status/1480448426332413953
  - tut-urut-utut 5y ago
    It says results were issued / ready, not that he received it. And given they were ready at 8pm it’s quite possible that the guy that makes Djokovics mail account was long gone. It may even have landed in the Spam folder if he is using Gmail (happened to me once).
    - aix1 5y ago
      C'mon, we're all adults here (and so is he). The "dog ate my homework" defense doesn't really cut it among grown-ups.
      - tut-urut-utut 5y ago
        Exactly, this is a potential criminal offence in Serbia, and school rules don’t apply here. It’s up to the court to decide what happened. I guess that Serbian courts can get the details about the results delivery. All it has to do is ask email providers to check logs, both on the sending and receiving side. As always, it’s the one making accusation that needs to provide a proof. On the other side, he can claim before Serbian court that all is five and the test was fake, but he can’t be processed about that in Serbia, since he neither faked nor used it there. And in Australia he can claim test is valid, and Australia would need to prove it’s fake if the want to cancel his visa. Which they cannot prove that easily, since Serbian authorities are not obliged to jump on immediately on the Australian request. Yes, it would be a loophole and playing two legal systems, but that’s what companies do all the time when it comes to taxes.