You're making assumptions and taking the conversation in a pedantic direction. I am aware of the nature of natural selection and how it builds complexity over

You're making assumptions and taking the conversation in a pedantic direction. I am aware of the nature of natural selection and how it builds complexity over time through various selection pressures not all of which are constantly aligned with end result. And although wings were initially little nubs not "designed" for flying you could say that wings are they are now are "designed" for flying. "Design" and "purpose" as I've said many times throughout this thread is a word that flows better. It is a linguistic choice and you are taking the argument in a direction thinking I don't understand some trivial point about natural selection.