2 ms·
IME async "context switches" are indeed vastly less costly, and I don't see why it wouldn't be. And I think calling it context switch is reading too much into
by foxfluff 5y ago
IME async "context switches" are indeed vastly less costly, and I don't see why it wouldn't be. And I think calling it context switch is reading too much into it, when it's really just the program continuing on to operate on different data.