> If you choose to download my code and include it in your project and it doesn't do what you expect, that is on you. Completely agree. But the key concept th

> If you choose to download my code and include it in your project and it doesn't do what you expect, that is on you. Completely agree. But the key concept that keep avoing is malicious intent. Let's make an analogy in a completely different topic: Are (D)DoS attacks wrong? do people owe us not to (D)Dos our machines? On one hand we connected our machines to the internet and declared ourself as ready to accept incoming traffic; on the other hand spinning up a bot army to render said machines unsusable is not nice. Is it correct to say that you should have some kind of (D)DoS pretection on your services? yes. Is it also correct to say that people should refrain from crapping on other people stuff? also yes. Getting back on topic; there is possibly a solid case to argue that this was not criminal (as no unauthorized "access" happened) but as much as open source volunteers should be more appreciated the "don't intentionally damage stuff with the SOLE intent of damaging stuff" is something expected of any human regardless of their social position.