5 ms·
Reading both your comments, the one way I'm interpreting is OP is saying "the true consequence of any capitalist system is..." and you're saying "capitalism doe
by MWil 5y ago
Reading both your comments, the one way I'm interpreting is OP is saying "the true consequence of any capitalist system is..." and you're saying "capitalism doesn't necessarily include..."
If it's not clear, I agree with OP. The complaint is valid because it's the "real world" consequence of applying the theory of capitalism.
Not in 100% of cases but in the "it's inevitable to exist" fashion.
- yetihehe 5y agoI would like to see a real world social system which did not end with "owners exploiting workers" in some fashion. As I said, MOST "*isms" did end with some class of people being exploited, typically by those wealthier people. It looks like exploiting people to generate wealth for yourself is default state of social systems and capitalism is not a solution for that.
- MWil 5y agoA real world system of "all co-owners" would be my first guess but I will be honest I am not as educated on this overall topic as I would like
- esarbe 5y agoHave a look at what the Mondragon Corporation is doing.[0][1] This is an attempt at Syndicalism (sorry, another *ism). So you have (free) markets and you have exchange of labor for salary, but profit is reinvested and shared between the shareholders which are the workers of the cooperative. https://www.mondragon-corporation.com/en/[0] https://www.mondragon-corporation.com/en/[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondrag%C3%B3n_Cooperative_Corporation[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondrag%C3%B3n_Cooperative_Cor...