4 ms·
> underestimate me. Given the term "ngrok", I can't say I blame them/it. It looks like a typo to me. I imagine for well over 90% of people searching, it woul
by meragrin_ 5y ago
> underestimate me.
Given the term "ngrok", I can't say I blame them/it. It looks like a typo to me. I imagine for well over 90% of people searching, it would be a typo. Perhaps, it is a common typo?
- eitland 5y agoWell, it is a well known tool for temporary tunneling of http. Google knows and the rest of the results confirm it. Now, if your explanation was the entire explanation it would be kind of ok if they did like Kagi do and Google did themselves at some point, ask nicely: did you mean <something else>? or we included results for <something else>. Please use doublequotes if you want exact matches. Of course with Google this would be pointless as as far as I can see they ignore doublequotes anyway these days...
- acdha 5y agoThat’s the key part: a decade ago, that search would have worked perfectly well. They removed the tools for fixing the problem so they own it.