> Code review → Valuable The activity in itself is not valuable, and code does not become better just because somebody looks at it. Identifying and subsequentl

> Code review → Valuable The activity in itself is not valuable, and code does not become better just because somebody looks at it. Identifying and subsequently fixing flaws -- that's what makes a code review worthwhile. Your concept more closely fits the idea of "certifying" code and in that case, as the review sponsor, you will interested in being able to hold someone accountable. And why would you want that liability to be transferable?