3 ms·
Well, I'm certainly no JS expert. I doubt I'm the guy to figure out what to do here, at this point. In any case, are you sure that JS generators should be cons
by ggchappell 15y ago
Well, I'm certainly no JS expert. I doubt I'm the guy to figure out what to do here, at this point.
In any case, are you sure that JS generators should be considered a "future" thing? I just did a bit of research, and it sounds like you are talking about this proposal:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:iterators_and_generators http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:iterators_a...
According to the following page, much/all of that proposal was included in JS 1.7, which was implemented in Firefox 2.0.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/New_in_javascript_1.7 https://developer.mozilla.org/en/New_in_javascript_1.7
And FF 2.0 was released in October 2006. A quick check shows that my FF installation (3.6.22) supports generator functions, and the "yield" keyword, just fine, as long as I say
<script type="text/javascript;version=1.7">
Regardless, I'm a little out of my depth here.