> I really doubt this. People are choosing to run his code, and choosing to update to whatever new code he publishes, regardless of the contents. Not sure that

> I really doubt this. People are choosing to run his code, and choosing to update to whatever new code he publishes, regardless of the contents. Not sure that's true. The fraudulent element there would be the clear and intentional misrepresentation. If the package were represented as a Bitcoin miner, that's one thing. However, representing it as color and styling for your terminal and then mining with it, that seems illegal. Would love a lawyer to weigh in.