Maybe time to revisit your assumptions. I'd grant the Guardian was still fairly decent under Rubsbridger, but under Viner its quality has dropped precipitously.

Maybe time to revisit your assumptions. I'd grant the Guardian was still fairly decent under Rubsbridger, but under Viner its quality has dropped precipitously. Full 180 on Assange, dereliction of their previous general support for international and UK leftwing issues. Nowadays they are a joke, washy liberalism and snapping at the coat-tails of US democrat readers (if any). A taint which also loses readers and undermines the authority of their (better) climate writers, which is a shame.