4 ms·
> Overall, I don't think "ethically defensible position" is equivalent to "they should not treat unvaccinated people" - yeah I guess this can be seen as "walkin
by pseudalopex 5y ago
> Overall, I don't think "ethically defensible position" is equivalent to "they should not treat unvaccinated people" - yeah I guess this can be seen as "walking it back" but overall I did not mean to outright state we shouldn't treat the unvaccinated.
Thanks for clarifying. They also said "Drop the vaccine mandates, and drop the mandates to treat the unvaccinated." And you said "I do agree however." But I can believe you just meant the last sentence. Feeling frustrated is natural when your friends and family are harmed. I hope they can get what they need.
- peterangular 5y agoAbsolutely - and thanks for providing the communicative space to clarify myself. I didn't feel it was going to be productive trying to clarify to /u/danenania when bad-faith was being harshly implied. I agree I was not clear in my comment as to what I was agreeing with - but I felt like I was being pushed to a position that I had not intended to take. 100% we need to treat people regardless of anyone's attitude (mine included), and 100% we need to continue to mandate vaccines. Thank you again for giving me the space to clarify =)