This article invokes the initial impression of providing a solution while actually containing as much value as saying that we could end world hunger by giving e

This article invokes the initial impression of providing a solution while actually containing as much value as saying that we could end world hunger by giving everyone something to eat. Yes, if every maintainer would actively test their software in depth(!) on ever update in dependencies, things like this would happen less. This not only fails to acknowledge the issue that the package author intended to "highlight" but just plain rudicules it. Yes if people put in way more unpaid labor, we might end up with a better quality product. (I do not support the package authors decision, I just think this article is a shameless clickgrab)