> So systems in these countries should just be built without any regard for foreign names? I never said anything about "should" and I think this conflation of

> So systems in these countries should just be built without any regard for foreign names? I never said anything about "should" and I think this conflation of "what this person knows the world is" with "what this person thinks the world should be" is detrimental to discourse. I've seen it in multiple places, especially online, and it leads to arguments where both people actually agree on what should be, but one of them is talking about what is and the other person can't or won't tell the difference between the two.