3 ms·
Sure, that is technically correct and if your only goal is to assign blame that's helpful to point out. But it does nothing to prevent this from happening agai
by notatoad 5y ago
Sure, that is technically correct and if your only goal is to assign blame that's helpful to point out. But it does nothing to prevent this from happening again.
The point here is how we can make it easier for svgo and every other package to avoid the problem in the first place.
- bhedgeoser 5y ago* It should be the responsibility of "svgo" to make sure it's direct dependencies are alright.
- gopher_space 5y agoWhy can't you point that attitude in both directions?