3 ms·
The data doesn't support your conclusion. Death isn't the only kind of harm. Even if what you're saying were accurate, some of us healthy people do actually int
by buu700 5y ago
The data doesn't support your conclusion. Death isn't the only kind of harm. Even if what you're saying were accurate, some of us healthy people do actually interact with older or immunocompromised people, and have enough courtesy to avoid putting their health at undue risk.
If you have a gripe with the recency of mRNA technology, you could just as easily advocate for more traditional alternatives. If you're scared of needles and don't like being pressured to get an injection, you could just say that. As-is you're discrediting yourself entirely.
Sure they did [suggest that the vaccine would prevent infection 100% reliably]
The comment you're replying to (mine) certainly did not. I'm not sure who you're referring to.
They've destroyed young kids childhood development[2] and they can't let it go. You got young healthy people that have no business worrying about this virus still panicking and avoiding real social lives.
Sure. None of that is my preference and it isn't relevant to my comment.