Perhaps top 1% contextually would be a better upper bound, though the exact number is an issue of economic statistics and not really the point I'm making. More

Perhaps top 1% contextually would be a better upper bound, though the exact number is an issue of economic statistics and not really the point I'm making. More so that a Marxian view of choices is often a very parsimonious way to understand the world, not to say it's the only way.