5 ms·

He was attacking Telegram because he’s resigning as the CEO of Signal? What is the obvious connection there that you have seen?

• sam_lowry_ 5y ago
  IMHO, he was attacking Telegram because Signal lost in popularity to Telegram, and investors were not happy. And he was attacking web3 because these same investors pushed cryptocurrency features into Signal, and he was wildly against it.
  • tptacek 5y ago
    Signal doesn't have investors.
    • sam_lowry_ 5y ago
      • deleted 5y ago
        [deleted]
      • tptacek 5y ago
        Obviously, none of this is true.
      • Klonoar 5y ago
        This reads like conspiracy theory with no hard facts to back it up. It’s been demonstrably false as well.
  • rcMgD2BwE72F 5y ago
    >investors were not happy. Who?
  • deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
  • sleepybrett 5y ago
    He was attacking Telegram because it was letting people believe that they conversations were e2e encrypted when they weren't.