3 ms·
>Absent any evidence of journalistic misconduct, I don't understand the point of making this connection. It's a textbook conflict of interest. Most sane places
by NaturalPhallacy 5y ago
>Absent any evidence of journalistic misconduct, I don't understand the point of making this connection.
It's a textbook conflict of interest. Most sane places have a policy of addressing even perceived conflicts of interest.
- woodruffw 5y ago"Disclose potential or actual conflicts of interest to a manager" is the 6th bullet on the very first link I provided. But again: there isn't even a perceived conflict of interest here, unless your perception includes a fatally flawed understanding of how journalistic outfits isolate their executive board. Reuters is not responsible for correcting that fatally flawed understanding.