> Do you have more information, than what is written in that article? No specifics, and I doubt that there will ever be any more unclassified specifics. That

> Do you have more information, than what is written in that article? No specifics, and I doubt that there will ever be any more unclassified specifics. That said, this is SOP for some sectors of the world. > Because I see your conclusion only as a vague possible hypothesis among many other options. Sure. That is probably how it will remain. > And intelligence services are by default usually into very grey, if not dark areas of ethics. Yep. > So all this might just as well be an internal power struggle of which the public will only get to view a very distorted picture, of what was actually going on. Yep.