3 ms·
I mark bugs, security-related issues, and planned features with appropriate labels, and the stale bot ignores those: https://github.com/geerlingguy/ansible-role
by geerlingguy 5y ago
I mark bugs, security-related issues, and planned features with appropriate labels, and the stale bot ignores those: https://github.com/geerlingguy/ansible-role-docker/blob/master/.github/stale.yml#L15 https://github.com/geerlingguy/ansible-role-docker/blob/mast...
Not all maintainers do the same. And some even _lock issues_, which I hate, because even closed issues can have a very fruitful discussion long after the issue was originally posted.
- j1elo 5y agoThen you are, in my humble opinion, doing it exactly right :-) (apart from going all-in and just never closing anything, but yours is a very good middle ground) > even closed issues can have a very fruitful discussion long after the issue was originally posted 100% agree! In some occasions I've learned a lot from reading long related conversations in a bug report that had been closed or resolved long since.
- mkeedlinger 5y agoTIL that my hatred of stale bot is somewhat misplaced, because it seems that it can be configured in a way I think is a lot more acceptable. Shame when it's set to be aggressive, it can be a serious hindrance. Issues almost act like a user forum, and can be super useful even if the maintainer doesn't want to put energy into that particular issue. I've found some really helpful work-arounds in "stale" issues.