4 ms·
> Well fuck them. It's his code, he should be able to do with it whatever he wants. He can do whatever he wants with his codes. It didn't means that private co
by Isthatablackgsd 5y ago
> Well fuck them. It's his code, he should be able to do with it whatever he wants.
He can do whatever he wants with his codes. It didn't means that private companies have to accept that due to liabilities. He is using an private company platform to publish his code which could make the company liable for him. By removing or suspending his account, the liability will be minimized and shift it to the developer. If the private company keep it in their system and widely available for distribution, other companies that got hit by this malicious code could have a standing to sue the hosting private company for allowing the code to be published. Imagine thousand companies have a lawsuit against the hosting company. So the hosting private company don't want to be liable for this and shutting off the account is their best interest to keep the liability off on them.
- okl 5y agoNot different from Google shutting down someone's account, something that's constantly bemoaned on Hacker News.
- Isthatablackgsd 5y agoDid Microsoft completely banned this developer from their other services? To my understanding, the developer account is suspended from GitHub. He is not banned from other MS products. That is the difference. In Google case, Google completely ban on all of their services to those banned users. If they are banned in Gmail, then likely they are banned from Play Store, Workspace, Google Drive, etc (entire Google ecosystem). In this case, Microsoft didn't banned this developers from their other services, it only the developer's GitHub account is suspended without affecting other services that the developers are using.
- okl 5y agoHow do you know that when you don't know what else he was using his GitHub account for?