2 ms·
Thanks for the info. I actually do very little with CSS (should have mentioned that / written with a more ignorant slant); in fact the only reason that I start
by waffle_ss 15y ago
Thanks for the info. I actually do very little with CSS (should have mentioned that / written with a more ignorant slant); in fact the only reason that I started using Less is because of that simple mixin feature.
I can definitely now see that Sass/SCSS is where it's at if one needs to do anything non-trivial with CSS. Guess I should really get back to using it over Less, as the basic syntax is almost identical anyhow.
- nathos 15y agoCheck out Compass when you get a chance and prepare to have your mind blown: http://compass-style.org/ http://compass-style.org/ As far as Sass vs. Less goes, I think it's great that both projects exist and are being improved and adopted at such a rapid pace. Less certainly borrowed some early ideas from Sass, and in turn SCSS syntax almost certainly exists because of Less.