4 ms·
> I don't see the harm in not having one. Email providers such as outlook and gmail think otherwise. Your emails will not be reliably delivered to them becaus
by wila 5y ago
> I don't see the harm in not having one.
Email providers such as outlook and gmail think otherwise. Your emails will not be reliably delivered to them because you are missing a restrictive DMARC policy.
Emails send without a DMARC policy are less trusted by default and more likely tagged as spam.
- jeffbee 5y agoThat doesn’t sound right to me. Gmail itself lacks a restrictive DMARC policy. They use p=none.